Period 3

-Adoption by gay couples :

The main point about discussing whether or not agree with gay couples have the right to adopt, is to know exactly what homosexuality is .
It is a very interesting topic because there are many interpretations , many from the religious , and other from science.
The latter will be in which I focus because the main theme is legal, and often legal stuff can be sufficiently impartial when it's evaluating only what we can see through science.
First , homosexuality from the intelectualism is the simple result of a decision , often based on the environment where the person lives .
However recently started talking about a gene that promotes homosexuality , based on a study which analyzed the relationship between male sexual orientation and a genetic marker on the X chromosome also investigated the pedigree of 114 families whose members are homosexual, and tried to establish a rule of kinship between members of homosexual tendencies . Apparently , there may be a genetic factor linked to the X chromosome ( the one that men and women possess both) .
This could tell us that many people simply discover their homosexuality or not having passed certain conditions related genetic status .
Still, many people may disagree with that statement , and therefore disagree with allowing adoption for homosexual couples.
But keep in mind a couple of things : life is about making decisions , and that's part of free alvedrio , no matter that we take to homosexuality from the intellectualist perspective or from the scientific point of view , to deprive homosexual couples to adopt would be a violation of their rights.

- Quizz
Here we have a quizz, I don't remember which one is from all the quizzes we have done, but I'm sure that it corresponds to the third period.
I think I could get a better grade, but maybe I was distracted that day.


- Something that I want to share (just by sheer whim) XD :
Maybe you're like WT*? but I want to tell you an anecdote: A few days ago I was on Aulas 3 with Iram (Andrea Molina) and I realized that she kept the plastic protector of her computer on; And I told her that those things are useless, and she was loosing the feels about unboxing something new, I don't know if you understand what I mean, but if you do, what do you think?, she doesn't wanted to get the plastic protector off, but I think that most of the people think this way:

XD

-Installation of cameras in public spaces:

Probably this is not a contentious issue in some countries , but it is not necessary to do an essay about why yes / not agree to put surveillance cameras in public luggers , many people think it could be a violation of privacy, however as the title says , it is only in public spaces, ie in these spaces there any privacy , the bad would be to try to install on all kinds of sites without any restrictions .
In countries like Mexico could be very useful installing these cameras to prevent crime waves precisely in public places , such as when a "subject " breaks the glass of a car to take what's inside is something that happens often , and would be very useful for better research and stop theft.
In general I think as long as it is in this way would be entirely consistent with the installation of cameras in public places.

1 comentario: